Involvd.com goes YouTube

View Comments

3 minutes, 2 slides and a founder …

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • FriendFeed
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Posterous
  • Tumblr
  • 豆瓣
  • 豆瓣九点
  • email
  • Print

Written by nick

March 15th, 2010 at 7:27 am

Posted in Business strategy

Project management tool? No silly, we sell productivity porn

View Comments

What is (will be) Involvd.com? That’s the million dollar question (hopefully more) that I get asked most often at the moment.

It’s a difficult one to answer quickly as we’re aiming to be a very broad-based service. Maybe it’s easier to answer what we’re not:

  • Not a social network though we will be highly social
  • Not a community though many of the features will be designed to foster community interaction
  • Not a project management application though will definitely be used as one
  • Not a collaboration tool though you’ll find it harder not to collaborate if we do it right

How about the largest online purveyor of the finest productivity porn then?



Productivity porn (aka ‘productivity pr0n’ for those old-handers) are those little tips, tricks and techniques that one can use to maximise one’s productivity. Most often, it refers either to objects that we can use to help us like index cards, post-it notes and to-do lists or to organisational systems like ‘when to do your email’, ‘when to answer the phone’ and ‘how to structure your diary’.

Marc Andreessen of Netscape, Ning and most recently Skype fame wrote a cracking article on productivity porn here (now in archive).

I have since implemented his ’index card the night before system’ and can tell you it works extremely well (especially for those that work from home like I do). I would also love to be in a position one day to ‘not keep a schedule’ like he did in 2007 (from the book, A Perfect Mess). Not sure I’m quite there yet professionally.

As a descriptor for what Involvd.com will be I think it marries pretty well. Every part of the business model is 100% focussed on our primary aim of increasing the productivity of individuals and groups. The hypothesis being that if people are more productive then that will leave space in their time-poor lives to do extra stuff of greater personal and social value that they maybe feel they don’t have either the time, inspiration or inclination to do right now. Crying out for some productivity porn as you can see!

I also like the initial reaction I get when I use the term.

If I get asked more out of politeness than interest what it is my fantastic new product is going to do the ‘porn’ word never fails to inject immediate attention into the conversation.

Take, for example, my pitch to Startup Bootcamp last Friday. As I was last out of lots on stage with the audience a little jaded I felt I needed to inject a little pick-me-up into my short. I decided, therefore, to give my new product genre a little run-out. A lady on the front-row exclaimed, several others gasped and plenty drew sharp intakes of breath that almost demanded me to explain myself (OK maybe a little more dramatic than it actually was but it certainly got more than if I’d gone with my original intro).

That’s all the ammunition I need to know I did the right thing and judging by my conversations after the session I could tell the rest of my pitch had piggy-backed in on the attention. The video will be online soon so I promise to post it up here once I have access to it (thanks for a fantastic night Alex Farcet).

This raises an important personal question however. If this venture goes nowhere then I’m likely to hear nothing about this again. If it’s successful however, I run the chance of being known as the Productivity Porn King for the rest of my career … hmmmmmmm … that sounds like a lose-lose to me … ah well, publish!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • FriendFeed
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Posterous
  • Tumblr
  • 豆瓣
  • 豆瓣九点
  • email
  • Print

Written by nick

March 8th, 2010 at 8:55 pm

Posted in Business strategy

Work @ Involvd.com

View Comments

Today is a big day for Involvd.com as I am launching the much anticipated recruitment campaign on across Copenhagen and the internet.

I am looking to build a large experienced team of IT professionals located in and around the Copenhagen area. If that’s you, you will be able to choose for yourself what you work on, when and how you do it. If you have experience with open-source technologies and the development process that will be an advantage (though not essential as long as you are a fast learner).

I can promise you I will work tirelessly to create an environment for you where you’ll meet, learn and work with like-minded technical people on a cutting-edge product.

You are, and will always be, my most important commodity and therefore you will work for a company that will include you as a shareholder when the prototype launches. Those of you that make the largest impact will be offered employment when funding is secured.

If all of that sounds good then the first step is for us to meet, get to know each other and discuss the project and your contribution in detail.

Call me … we’ll have a lot of fun

PS A big thanks goes to my good friend and hugely talented copy-writer Hugo Bone (www.hugo-bone.com) and his man Rich for putting this poster together. All your time and effort is very much appreciated

PPS Contrary to how the poster might look to the casual observer this project is not all about money. We will certainly be looking to turn a tidy profit but it’s not my absolute core purpose. I had many debates with Hugo about this message as it definitely made us both, at different times, feel a little uncomfortable but we wanted something that would make an impact on the passer-by and I think it does that. Do you?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • FriendFeed
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Posterous
  • Tumblr
  • 豆瓣
  • 豆瓣九点
  • email
  • Print

Written by nick

February 22nd, 2010 at 4:45 pm

Posted in Business strategy

The route to launch-day

View Comments

To help describe the route I’m intending over the coming months I’ll try to cater for different learning styles, especially both right and left brain thinkers, so I’m going to lean on an excellent concept being developed by Peter Hilton (@PeterHilton) of Lunatech Ventures currently. The Plancruncher website is here.

Having been inspired by the simplicity of the Creative Commons icons they’ve created a series of images that could be used to cover-note business plan Executive Summaries. They’ve identified seven standard sections of a plan within which the writer can summarise their offering (the team, the idea, the product/service, the revenue model, funding requirements, partnership requirements and the return on investment detail). Here’s Peter’s full presentation.

Now I’m not looking to summarise my business plan for a pitch just yet but I should be able to use the model to show the position I’m in today, the position I’m looking to get to when funding will be a requirement and a mid-way step in between. So here goes:

Phase 1

Phase 1

  • The product is vapourware (no working demo or prototype)
  • There is no team (it’s just me)
  • The idea is new and is going to take the world by storm
  • The founder is an ambitious and wildly enthusiastic entrepreneur
  • There is an elevator pitch that receives great feedback wherever it’s rolled out

Phase 2

Phase 2

  • The product is a combination of several well proven concepts
  • We are building the product ourselves
  • We’re open-source through and through (both technologically and culturally – see earlier post)
  • We have a prototype that is invite-only to allow us to manage load and receive valuable early feedback
  • We are bootstrapping (self-funded) and are extremely careful with our expenses and costs (as we always will be as long as I’m involvd)

Phase 3

  • There is a main revenue stream with more in the pipeline (none are advertising-based)
  • We have developed the product and own all the IP
  • We have a working product live on the internet
  • The community is our #1 asset and we treat them accordingly. Network effects are present and we’re heading for critical mass
  • We are looking for funding in return for a share of equity

So there we go, I hope that gives you more of an idea of where I’m going with this. Priority #1 at the moment is to turn this from an “I” to a “We” so early next week I’ll be launching my recruitment campaign.

When I have built a team I intend for us to work out together the details of how we’re going to get from Phase 1 to Phase 2. I’ll be sure to let you know how I get on.

Coming soon — launch of the recruitment campaign, early progress

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • FriendFeed
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Posterous
  • Tumblr
  • 豆瓣
  • 豆瓣九点
  • email
  • Print

Written by nick

February 17th, 2010 at 10:27 am

Posted in Business strategy

Cake with copen source, please

View Comments

Q: What the **** is copen source?
Me: Fair question! Copen source is my chosen development style or methodology. Mostly open source with a little closed thrown in.

Q: Not heard of it I’m afraid. What’s that?
Me: Not surprised really. I’ve just made it up.

Q: Will it succeed?
Me: No idea. I’m not sure it’s been tried before.

Q: Why are you doing it then?
Me: Because I want lots of people to come and help me bake the cake.

Q: What are you talking about?
Me: Well it’s like this. I’ve created what I think is a nice sounding recipe of a cake and I want to get lots of others to come and help me make, bake and taste it. I’m figuring that the more people that come and stick their fingers in the mixing bowl the better the likelihood that the final recipe will be knock-out tasty. The tastier it is the better it will sell, right?

Q: Yeh I guess. What happens when this cake of yours is done?
Me: Well that’s another reason to go down the copen source route. Once the cake is ready then it needs to be decorated. Now not everyone wants their cakes to look the same, do they? So we’ll need lots of others to come and help pretty it up. If there are plenty of people already involvd in the project then we’ll be off to a flying start.

Q: Right … think I get it … can you break it down for me and maybe keep these cakes out of it?
Me: Sure. As the name implies (visually) it’s 80% open source and 20% closed. C-O-P-E-N. These 5 convenient ‘C’ words provide a little more detail of the characteristics from both systems that I’ll look to leverage:

Cost [open]

  • Developers will self-organise into teams or work individually (depending on their inclination) which will mean very low management overheads
  • They are also involvd for the opportunity of achieving the project’s vision and not solely for monetary compensation. They are here to be part of something great (with the added bonus of employment and share options if the launch goes well)

Capacity [open]

  • “Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow” said a very wise man once. Larger groups of developers coding and fixing bugs can put orders of magnitude more skilled time into solving problems and developing new functionality than they can in smaller closed systems

Capability [open]

  • Every open-source project has some kind of under-the-table reputation management system bubbling away. This dictates who in the project exerts the most influence and the best naturally rise to the top

Condition (also read Quality, Reliability and Security) [open]

  • Implementations that have been comprehensively peer-reviewed by many can be better trusted to have code that is efficient, scalable and secure. Developers tend to be less territorial over their code in open systems
  • Developers who work on their own terms (when, how, on what) are more content and motivated to produce better work, “enjoyment predicts efficiency”
  • Open and transparent feedback loops ensure project goals are defined not by management committees but by users alone
  • Succession planning naturally occurs in open-source systems which mitigates an otherwise key project risk

Control [closed]

  • The development team are located in close geographic proximity as face-to-face requirements events are necessary to shape and define the project. This will result in a more closely bonding team than you would see in open-source and offers a more friendly community dimension
  • The code falls under copyright and remains proprietary until such time as network effects have led to market dominance

It is my plan at this time that the platform code will eventually go fully open-source whether this succeeds or fails as a project. Eric Raymond’s discriminators that push towards open source are all there for this project. The reason not to do so at this stage is that for open source to work one of the key rules is:

It’s fairly clear that one cannot code from the ground up in bazaar style. One can test, debug and improve in bazaar style, but it would be very hard to originate a project in bazaar mode. Your nascent developer community needs to have something runnable and testable to play with.
Cathedral & Bazaar

From the time the prototype is up-and-running the decision on when and how to go fully open source will be on the table.

The term copen source also has a nice tie in with our location of course —- Copenhagen

Coming soon —– high-level plan, launch of the recruitment campaign

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • FriendFeed
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Posterous
  • Tumblr
  • 豆瓣
  • 豆瓣九点
  • email
  • Print

Written by nick

February 15th, 2010 at 8:04 am